If

Do I have a responsibility to make some kind of sense?
Or, if I am to expect to be treated as a person, am I required to think like a person?
I am in left-field. Unequivocally. I am an equivocator.

Persons start with a thesis; persons make points. Persons wade in and out of water, for pleasure; persons don't arbitrarily come up with the idea to wade in and out of water, where there is clearly no water to wade in and out of. Persons don't smoke cigarettes, as cigarettes are deathly. Persons say deadly when they mean deadly, and deathly when they mean deathly. Persons do not wish to die, persons do not think of death; persons may think of death, but will certainly never allow an inconsistency of thought to play out in the public eye, as I have done here.

As for the definition of equivocate, google says that it is to "use ambiguous language so as to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself." Well, I'd say I'm more of the second type of equivocator. Not that I'm essentially non-committal, though, really; rather, although I'm sure I'm very committed to at least one thing, that thing is ambiguous. At least, it is ambiguous to most schools of thought. But then, what if you, too, are a like-minded equivocator? It may be that only the lazy know what the drive behind their laziness is. It may be that this is all nonsense; I'm a very unrecognised author, so I could see how it might be true that this is all nonsense. I'm not an author at all, so now I'm almost certain that this is nonsense; but, for the sake of self-preservation, I'm going to assume that there is some truth to the nonsense.